So, let me get this straight, Brenton. If it’s free speech for The Examiner to voice an opinion, but it’s an attack on free speech for Karl Stevens to voice an opinion about The Examiner’s voicing an opinion, does that make your voicing an opinion about Karl’s voicing an opinion about The Examiner’s voicing an opinion free speech or an attack on free speech? It’s very confusing and we need you, as one of Tasmania’s foremost public intellectuals, to sort it out ASAP.
Show Comments
Comments (0)