Not sure if you needed eagle eyes to spot it, although I must admit that I didn’t spot that it was “4” that was missing, I just thought that someone had stuffed up somewhere.
It’s actually an interesting, if inadvertent,  chance to assess how effective this sort of campaign is. Look for the pro millers who quote statistics without a “4”!
Another dilemma that has arisen, that is what do anti-mill persons do with this publication? I have two copies on my dining table. I am aware that each of these copies has cost money, resources and effort to produce and distribute.
My answer is to take them to work with me and leave a copy or two in the most red neck crib room I encounter. If you’re fairly up on female anatomy the reading in these places is quite predictable, so an update on the down side of pulp mills could make a pleasant change!

If you take the NATIONAL polls and exclude Georgetown and disregard ‘don’t knows’, over the last two years the figures come out at 29% in favour and 71% against.

Maybe this should be made a top priority election issue, as it appears that Georgetown is the only safe Laboral seat!

That too would disappear if the mill was scrapped or moved to Hampshire.

Would you please let us know where the ‘4’ is missing in the printed version of the table. I haven’t seen the TAP newspaper. I wonder how many people have yet seen it. The figures here are highly revealing, fascinating and reassuring. However, the point of this brief item is not well made without visually highlighting the error. The piece is frustrating without clarification.