The following , i tender because of the recent EXPOSE on ” Martin Bryant” in recent times by the Media and which prompted me ( thanks to the wonders of the Internet ) to examine the case and associated facts more closely.

      Whilst I do not , suggest that Martin Bryant was not involved in the port Arthur Massacre , the recent Expose on his demeanour and the fact that he spent a lifetime endeavouring to seek out and make friends begs the question, Why then, does he refuse to see anyone now ? as we are continually told by our officials ?  has ANYONE actually said !  “I WANT TO HEAR THAT FROM HIM PERSONALLY” .

      Is it possible that given his state of health ,coupled with the fact that he has attempted suicide on several occasions that what really happened that day will go with him to the grave and if ! as has been suggested by many articles that can be googled that he was assisted ! and or framed !  in order to bring about a disarmament of Australian citizenry !    Do we not have that right to know ?

      The following is but a small part of the wealth of information that is available and in my opinion needs more thorough investigation.

    Totally professional shooting ! from a guy who was a total klutz in the usage of firearms

    The following is the best the forensic scientists could deduce from the crime scene and there may be small variations, but in the final analysis they matter little. What does matter is that at this precise juncture the gunman had killed twelve victims and wounded a further ten in 15 seconds flat, using only 17 rounds fired from the right hip. Such a staggering performance is on a par with the best combat shooters in the world, and two retired counter-terrorist marksmen ruefully admitted they would be hard pressed to equal such awesome speed and accuracy. Both agreed that attributing such a performance to an intellectually-impaired invalid with an IQ of 66 and severely limited cognitive functions, amounts to nothing less than certifiable insanity on the part of Bryant’s accusers. In military terms a fatal shot to the upper neck counts as a head shot, so for all practical purposes those who died during the first 15 seconds were killed by head shots fired with lethal accuracy from the gunman’s hip.

    Next the very professional gunman moved towards the area of the souvenir shop and killed Nicole Burgess with a shot to the head, then shot Mrs. Elizabeth Howard through the chest and arm with fatal consequences. Swivelling around, the gunman killed Mr. Lever with a shot to the head, and killed Mrs. Meander with another shot to the head. Temporarily distracted, he fired back into the cafe area and wounded Mr. Crosswell. Turning again he shot Mr. Winter twice, killing him with a shot to the head. On his way back to the souvenir area the gunman wounded Mr. Olson, then proceeded to the kill-zone near the locked door where he killed Mr. Jary, Pauline Masters, and Mr. Nash, all of them with single shots to the head.

  Changes clips

    At this stage the gunman had killed twenty and wounded another twelve with a total of 29 rounds. He then stopped firing and changed magazines in a most professional way. The magazine fitted to the AR15 held 30 rounds total, so by changing magazines after firing only 29 shots the gunman ensured that he still had a live round in the breech in case anyone moved, enabling him to kill that person instantly if caught unaware. Such professionalism is well known to counter-terrorist personnel. Critically, the gunman then waited motionless in the Broad Arrow Cafe with a fully loaded magazine, which brings us back to the differential between the verified time estimate of four to five minutes, and the inaccurate official claim of 90 second.
                  d.d.

Bryant(continued)

  It is easy to see why government and media continued to rebut Wendy Surr and her colleagues’ insistent claims about the elapsed time and the door that refused to open. Either or both had the potential to open a Pandora’s Box with catastrophic results, for there was no way the Tasmanian Government could openly and honestly investigate these matters without running the risk of “accidentally” proving that its villain of choice, Martin Bryant, was innocent of all charges. In addition, the drugs decoy and the stunning accuracy of the gunman in the Broad Arrow had to be swept under the carpet, before informed members of the public had the chance to realise the “lone nut” massacre was in reality a highly planned paramilitary operation with geopolitical motives, designed from the outset to undermine Australian national security.

  In the view of this author, and others, the 5.56-mm Colt AR15 was deliberately selected for three specific reasons, one of which was its known ability to inflict horrific and highly visual injuries at close range, caused by its low-mass bullets traveling at extreme velocity. The nature of those wounds caused revulsion among police, emergency service workers and medical staff, thereby assisting the immediate drive by anti-gun lobbyists to have all semi-automatic weapons outlawed. As the leader of the National Embalming Team wrote, “Approximately 90% of all deceased persons had severe head trauma. The bullet wound was normally inflicted to the head with the resultant smaller entry wound and larger exit wound. Some of the deceased persons had an entry wound with no exit wound, the result of this was an explosion of the skull…” Despite her thirty years of ambulance experience, Wendy Surr still remembers being shocked when she accidentally trod on shattered skull fragments, before being confronted with a human brain lying in a bowl of chips.

  In the medium to long term the lobbyists and international power brokers will be unable to sustain their claim that Martin Bryant was the villain, because there is simply too much hard evidence proving the “official line” to be criminal scam. Some American video evidence submitted to the Supreme Court has already been scientifically proven a forgery, deliberately submitted to the court in order to secure the conviction of Martin Bryant on all counts, in the event that he continued to plead “Not Guilty.” Due to the seriousness of this offence, copies of the scientific proof have been sent by registered mail to departments which should take active steps to have the material reviewed and struck out of evidence, and then urgently implement strategies to ensure the future integrity of Australian national security.

                    d.d.

Bryant(continued)

  It is easy to see why government and media continued to rebut Wendy Surr and her colleagues’ insistent claims about the elapsed time and the door that refused to open. Either or both had the potential to open a Pandora’s Box with catastrophic results, for there was no way the Tasmanian Government could openly and honestly investigate these matters without running the risk of “accidentally” proving that its villain of choice, Martin Bryant, was innocent of all charges. In addition, the drugs decoy and the stunning accuracy of the gunman in the Broad Arrow had to be swept under the carpet, before informed members of the public had the chance to realise the “lone nut” massacre was in reality a highly planned paramilitary operation with geopolitical motives, designed from the outset to undermine Australian national security.

  In the view of this author, and others, the 5.56-mm Colt AR15 was deliberately selected for three specific reasons, one of which was its known ability to inflict horrific and highly visual injuries at close range, caused by its low-mass bullets traveling at extreme velocity. The nature of those wounds caused revulsion among police, emergency service workers and medical staff, thereby assisting the immediate drive by anti-gun lobbyists to have all semi-automatic weapons outlawed. As the leader of the National Embalming Team wrote, “Approximately 90% of all deceased persons had severe head trauma. The bullet wound was normally inflicted to the head with the resultant smaller entry wound and larger exit wound.

  In the medium to long term the lobbyists and international power brokers will be unable to sustain their claim that Martin Bryant was the villain, because there is simply too much hard evidence proving the “official line” to be criminal scam. Some American video evidence submitted to the Supreme Court has already been scientifically proven a forgery, deliberately submitted to the court in order to secure the conviction of Martin Bryant on all counts, in the event that he continued to plead “Not Guilty.” Due to the seriousness of this offence, copies of the scientific proof have been sent by registered mail to departments which should take active steps to have the material reviewed and struck out of evidence, and then urgently implement strategies to ensure the future integrity of Australian national security.

                    d.d.

Not before a few days ago had I even questioned the issue as to whether Martin Bryant was guilty, such is the power of suggestion !  and power of the media.
 
  After reading the WEALTH of information and sites that point to his innocence, (one only has to google Martin Bryant (tasmania). I have come to believe that just maybe a gross miscarriage of justice may have taken place as there are just too many anomalies for there not to have been and what is surprising is that many of the sites have had photo’s removed “supposedly of him ! but disputed ! by many, why is this ? and who has the power to remove such information ?
 
  There really are hundreds of questions that HAVE NOT been answered and ignored, if indeed there is no conspiracy then why the blanket of secrecy ?

  Why is access to Martin Bryant refused ? we are told that he does not wish to see anyone ! after reading the expose in the newspapers telling us how he went to such bizarre lengths to meet and speak with people, does anyone really believe such a story ?

  Has anyone actually been “TOLD BY MARTIN BRYANT IN PERSON ” ! other than those tending to him that he doesn’t wish to see anyone ? 

  Can anyone answer, just these few questions from hundreds more I personally ! would like to ask ?
              d.d.