I’d be on the footpath somewhere observing Lennon’s antics, not in the shop.
( and no, I’m not a rat jumping off a sinking ship! )
Posted by Lee Lacker on 20/02/06 at 05:03 AM
Having thought about this for a while, I’d like to apologise to Lee for accusing him of being biased (and a few other things), a short time back.
Since then (and before to be truthful) I’ve found his comments to be really interesting ... he seems to be writing from a very informed position indeed.
I’ll take a stab at it and guess that he(?) is a member of the Tasmanian media pack, playing the game amongst us, under a Meryl Streep-inspired psuedonym. Fascinating!
So, (belated) greetings Lee.
Sorry about that.
Jason
Posted by Jason Lovell on 21/02/06 at 03:41 AM
Nice to see that Jason Lovell has calmed down a bit. I mean, I would probably agree with him on some issues??
Posted by super Annoyed on 21/02/06 at 06:08 AM
It’s a ‘he’, but I’ll keep you guessing on everything else.
And, water off a duck’s back mate, really
Posted by Lee Lacker on 21/02/06 at 06:10 AM
Cheers Lee. I do actually have a conscience and it’s been pricked a bit of late.
Thanks for that.
As for you SA, just piss off will you?
This is/was between Lee and me, not you.
You bloody try hard wannabe ...
Jason
Posted by Jason on 21/02/06 at 07:37 AM
I’ve wondered if the initails are the wrong way around.
Props
S.Lakka
A.Noyd
Lou Pieman (loopy man, this one is a stretch I’ll admit)
Is there a hidden Abbey Rd type meaning in this?
Posted by Simon R on 21/02/06 at 09:36 AM
I only just got the cartoon! Very good - most amusing. You could still lose the photocopy heads- you have the drawing ability so have a go at the portraits. Good to see I still have the power to annoy Jason Lovell too.
Show Comments
Comments (7)