Dave I can see a time when this Exaggerator outperforms the other Exaggerator.
Posted by no pulp mill on 12/10/09 at 11:38 AM
Is that a bunny caught in FT’s sights, or Sturgo’s two fingers again?
Posted by Russell Langfield on 12/10/09 at 12:34 PM
And the heroic minister leaps a building in a single bound, in defence of ... John Gay, the toxic king.
Posted by salamander on 12/10/09 at 11:27 PM
It’s about time that the citizens of Tasmania realised that to have the Lab/Lib gov’t running our state is to have Gunns and FT running the state…and the gov’t depts (police etc) are answerable to the gov’t. So did we really expect anything different in the event of the ‘Happy one’ having his house vandalized along with a number of others in the same street, but we only heard about his at the time because it suited their agenda. I’m so glad that this has all come back to bite them.
Posted by Concerned Resident on 14/10/09 at 01:05 PM
Karl I take exception to The Exaggatorial being humped in with that other rag of ill repute.
The Exaggatorial strives to be a work of excellence and clings to the faint hope, that X-file rich nuance, that the truth is out there.
As far as performance goes, “The Barras” will soon tell.
I have it on good authority that an upmarket version of the Exaggatorial will soon pave the way for a win at this magnificent journalistic event…..
Show Comments
Comments (5)