Is any opinion in the Ex worth a comment?

The morality of skewing a process aagainst the community and risking the investments of its members in the interest of one company subsidized by taxpayers seems to escape these spinners from Patterson St.

Authorised by phill Parsons 199 Samuel St Elizabeth Town.

The Examiner newspaper has shown itself to be the defender of corporate rape and pillage by the forestry lords, for why else would an organ of public expression be so intent to go against the will of the people?
I cannot accept that this news medium is relative and supportive to the vast majority of the people whom dwell in this Northern region of Tasmania?
Maybe a name change is in order, eg: ‘The Corporate Forestry Digest’ quickly comes to mind?

Maybe this media medium (?) could become another GBE for this State government, for the others in this category are also blind to the reality of fair and open dealings?

I like the fact that half this article is upside down, suggesting it is not worth reading, so don’t make the effort.